Updated: 27 May 2026
Corrections Policy — Canada
Canadian Casino Bonuses relies on publicly available information, operator terms and licensing documentation available at the time of writing. Online casino terms and licensing details change frequently, and we depend on readers to flag anything that looks outdated so our comparisons stay useful. For Canada readers, the practical frame remains licensing context and dispute routes.
What counts as a reportable error
A reportable error is a factual claim on this site that no longer matches an operator's public terms, licensing status, game catalogue or bonus structure. This includes wagering requirements, deposit figures, licence numbers and jurisdiction references that have changed since publication. For Canada readers, the practical frame remains licensing context and dispute routes.
What we need from you
Include the exact page URL, the specific sentence or figure you believe is wrong, and a source that supports the correction. Reports without a URL or a way to verify the claim take considerably longer to action, if at all. For Canada comparison purposes, the reference point is licensing context and dispute routes.
How we check sources
Where possible we check the operator's own terms page, a publicly listed licensing register, or official communication before making any change. If a source has moved, tell us when you accessed it and what it said. Its relevance to Canada is considered through licensing context and dispute routes.
Material changes versus minor corrections
A material change affects a reader's understanding of a bonus, a licence or a ranking, and is prioritised accordingly. A minor correction, such as a typo, is fixed as time allows and doesn't usually warrant a dated note. For Canada readers, the practical frame remains licensing context and dispute routes.
Dating our updates
Where a material change is made to a review, we aim to reflect an updated date on the affected page. Minor corrections may not carry a separate timestamp. For the Canada comparison, the editorial lens is licensing context and dispute routes.
Temporary publication states
While a report is being verified, a page may be temporarily flagged, adjusted or, rarely, unpublished if the claim could otherwise mislead readers about licensing or bonus terms. This is a precaution, not a conclusion about the report. For Canada readers, the practical frame remains licensing context and dispute routes.
When a report is not actioned
Not every report results in a change. If our sourcing at the time was accurate and the situation has since changed, we may add an update rather than treat the original text as an error, and try to explain briefly why. The local reading for Canada gives priority to licensing context and dispute routes.
Fair criticism we stand behind
Corrections cover factual accuracy, not editorial opinion. Our judgements about game selection, mobile usability or how we weigh licensing context reflect editorial analysis, and disagreeing with a ranking isn't the same as finding a factual error. The editorial context for Canada places this detail beside licensing context and dispute routes.
Urgent or security-related reports
If you believe a linked casino poses an active security risk, such as a compromised site or a fraudulent clone of a legitimate operator, flag it as urgent so we can review the listing without the usual queue delay. The practical emphasis for Canada stays on licensing context and dispute routes.
Personal disputes with a casino
This process only covers what's published on our site. A personal dispute over a withdrawal or account closure needs to go directly to the casino operator and, if unresolved, to their licensing authority, not to us. The Canada comparison keeps licensing context and dispute routes in view.
Privacy while reporting
Please don't include passwords, full payment details or identity document scans in a correction report. A description of the discrepancy and a source link is all we need. The practical emphasis for Canada stays on licensing context and dispute routes.
A clear, repeatable process
Every report is read, checked against available sources where practical, and either actioned, queued for further verification, or declined with a brief reason. We don't promise a fixed response time, but reports with clear evidence move fastest. This matters in the Canada context when considering licensing context and dispute routes.
Helping us keep things accurate
Readers flagging outdated terms or licensing changes are one of the main ways this site stays reliable. A precise, sourced report is the most effective way to see a correction made promptly. The local reading for Canada gives priority to licensing context and dispute routes.